1
Ch’en Hsiang visited Mencius and repeated the words of Hsü Hsing,
saying, “The ruler of T’eng is indeed a worthy ruler. But he has not
heard the Way. [According to it], the worthy cultivate the field together
with the people for food, and prepare their own meals while they carry on the
government. …”
Mencius said, “… Why does Master Hsü not do the work of the potter and
the founder, and supply himself with the articles which he uses solely from his
own establishment? Why does he go in great confusion to deal and exchange
with the hundred artisans? Why does he mind all the trouble?” “The
work of the various artisans can in fact not be done along with farming.”
“When can the government of the empire alone be done along with farming?
There is the work of great men and there is the work of little men.
Furthermore, whatever is needed for one single person is supplied by the
various artisans. If one must make the things himself before he uses
them, this would make the whole empire run about on the road. Therefore
it is said, ‘Some labor with their minds and some labor with their strength.
Those who labor with their minds govern others; those who labor with their
strength are governed by others.’ Those who are governed by others
support them; those who govern them are supported by them. This is a
universal principle. …”
Ch’en Hsiang said, “If the way of Master Hsü were followed, there would
not be two prices in the market. Even if a young boy goes there, none
would cheat him. Linen and silk of the same length would be sold at the
same price. Bundles of hemp and silk of the same weight would be sold at
the same price. Grains of the same quantity would be sold at the same
price. And shoes of the same size would be sold at the same price.”
Mencius said, “It is the nature of things to be unequal. Some are
twice, some five times, some ten times, some a hundred times, and some one
thousand or ten thousand times as valuable as others. If you equalize
them all, you would throw the world into confusion. If large shoes
and small shoes were of the same price, who would make them? If the
doctrines of Master Hsü were followed, people would lead one another to
practice deceit. How can these doctrines be employed to govern a
state?” [Book of Mencius 3A:4]
In the Book of Mencius 3A:4, Mencius explained inequality as a universal
principle. When Ch’en Hsiang criticized the ruler of T’eng as a worthy ruler
but one who hasn’t heard the way because he doesn’t cultivate the fields with
the people while carrying on with the government, Mencius answered Ch’en Hsiang
that this is the way of the universe.
Mencius explained in
the first part that if one has to do everything for one’s self, will not one be
in great confusion? If there is no distribution of work and one has to do
everything for himself, one would not finish much. There would be lack of time
and everyone will be in a hurry to fend for himself. Mencius stated that there
is a need for inequality because it is in their differences that one would
create flourish. There is a need for division of labor for the entire community
to be progressive. Mencius acknowledges that there are people who work with
their minds and there are people who work with their hands. The people who work
with their minds govern those who work with their hands while the people who
work with their hands support those who work with their minds. Through
cooperation and helping one another, both the people who work with their minds
and those who work with their hands accomplish much and progress together. It
is in their differences that they unite together. This makes it much easier for
both parties thus there is no need to rush and be confused. The other cares for
another. One doesn’t work for one’s self alone which makes their workload
lighter. Because of this, it is in their differences that they found harmony
instead of disharmony. Like in a guitar, it is in the differences of tone that
when strummed as one, is what makes it create beautiful music. It is explained
by Mencius that it is in the differences of people, the universal law, that makes
harmony, possible.
Harmony is not uniformity. Harmony lies in the congruity of parts with one another and the whole. It is never being one and the same. It is in the compatibility of opinions and actions that it could be found. Harmony could be found amidst the differences, not in the sameness. It lies in the acceptance and agreement of each and every quality of each parts integrated into its whole. Harmony as what Mencius wanted to explain is "Unity in Diversity".
No comments:
Post a Comment